zum Inhalt springen

Programm XPrag 2017

   

We have created a repository on Open Science Framework where participants can upload their posters and slides. We encourage everyone to take advantage of this opportunity to make their work available to one another as well as to those who are unable to attend the conference.

A pdf with the updated program (as of June 14, 2017) and all abstracts in alphabetical  order can be found here .

  

Tuesday, 20.06.201719:00Informal get-togetherat Maybach (with registration desk)
 
Wednesday, 21.06.201712:30Registration 
 13:00Welcome 
 13:15Jennifer RoddHow do listeners understand the meanings of ambiguous words?
 14:15Coffee break 
 14:45Catherine Davies, Vincent Porretta, Kremena Koleva and Ekaterini KlepousniotouDo speaker-specific cues influence ambiguous word interpretation?
 15:15Paolo Canal, Luca Bischetti, Simona Di Paola and Valentina BambiniSocial abilities help us detecting jokes: An EEG study on the temporal dynamics of humor comprehension
 15:45Andrea BeltramaSubjective assertions are weak: an experimental study on perspective-dependent meaning
 16:15Coffee break 
 16:45Elspeth Wilson and Napoleon KatsosSpeaker epistemic state and ad hoc quantity implicatures in children
 17:15Kyriakos Antoniou, Alma Veenstra, Mikhail Kissine and Napoleon KatsosHow does childhood bilingualism and bi-dialectalism affect the interpretation and processing of implicature?
 17:45Irene Symeonidou and Wing Yee ChowThrough the eyes of a teenager: complexity of real-time Theory of Mind inferences in language comprehension
 18:15Poster session I (see below)
 
(with drinks and snacks)

Thursday,

22.06.2017

9:30Bruno GalantucciExperimental Semiotics: What is it? What is it good for?
 10:30Coffee break 
 11:00Nausicaa Pouscoulous and Giulio DulcinatiQuantity implicatures in a competitive game
 11:30Diana Dimitrova, Brian McElree and Petra SchumacherSpeed and accuracy trade-off and their link to neural processes of meaning composition
 12:00Felix Frühauf, Berry Claus, Sophie Repp, Manfred Krifka and Anna Marlijn Meijer Two response systems for German 'ja' and 'nein'? Evidence from usage preference data and interpretation data 
 12:30Lunch breakcheck out restaurant map
 14:00Ming Xiang, Chris Kennedy and Allison KramerThreshold adaptation and its time course
 14:30Christina Kim and Louisa SalhiVisual contrast, discourse contrast and conceptual convention
 15:00

 

Judith Holler, Kobin Kendrick and Stephen Levinson

Turn-timing and the body: Gestures play a core role in coordinating conversation    
 15:30Coffee break & photo  
 16:00Poster session II (see below)
 
 
 18:30Conference dinnerat UndSohn

Friday,

23.06.2017

9:30Kathryn DavidsonCombining continuous and discrete representations in speech, sign, and gesture
 10:30Coffee break 
 11:00Stavroula Alexandropoulou, Jakub Dotlaèil and Rick Nouwen.Pragmatic effects attested in online interpretation of "more than" and "at least"
 11:30Teodora Mihoc and Kathryn Davidson

Testing a PPI analysis of superlative modified numerals

 

 12:00Alice Rees and Lewis Bott Investigating shared representations in implying and inferring
 12:30Lunch breakcheck out restaurant map
 14:00Mikhail KissineWhat Autism Spectrum Disorder can teach us about pragmatics
 15:00Coffee break 
 15:30Martien Wampers and Walter SchaekenScalar Implicatures And The Literal-First Hypothesis: Theory Of Mind And Working Memory Effects In Pragmatic Inferences By Patients With Psychosis
 16:00Bob van Tiel and Mikhail KissinePragmatic impairment is selective in autism: evidence from quantity implicatures
 16:30Oliver BottImmediate use of discourse context in aspectual coercion - An eyetracking during reading study
 17:00Farewell 
 17:30Cultural eventStreet art tour or historic city walk

 

Talk Alternates:

  1.  Judith Holler, Kobin Kendrick and Stephen Levinson. Turn-timing and the body: Gestures play a core role in coordinating conversation
  2. Stefan Hinterwimmer, Umesh Patil and Andreas Brocher. Do German demonstrative pronouns avoid prominent perspectival centers?
  3. Paula Rubio-Fernandez and Julian Jara-Ettinger. A new Director task: Modelling common ground through referential specificity
  4. Diana Mazzarella, Emmanuel Trouche, Hugo Mercier and Ira Noveck. Believing what you're told: Politeness and scalar inferences

Poster session I:

  1. Alix Kowalski and Yi Ting Huang. Listeners encode multiple meanings when generating scalar inferences --> canceled, see poster on OSF
  2. Jeffrey Geiger and Ming Xiang. Ellipsis in context: The interaction of identity and discourse salience
  3. Claudia Poschmann. At-issue: Non-restrictive relative clauses
  4. Sophie Egger, Bettina Braun and Nicole Dehé. The realization of bouletic bias: Evidence from German questions
  5. Guilio Dulcinati and Nausicaa Pouscoulousinati. Scalar implicatures in non-cooperative contexts
  6. Richard Breheny, Chao Sun and Ye Tian. Rates of scalar inferences beyond ‘some’ – A corpus study
  7. Cecília Molnár, Beáta Gyuris and Katalin Mády. Evidential bias and polar questions – the division of labour in Hungarian
  8. Daniele Panizza and John M. Jr. Tomlinson. Pragmatic inferences towards prototypical meanings. A visual world study.
  9. Laia Mayol. Asymmetries between interpretation and production in Catalan pronouns
  10. Tamás Káldi, Anna-Christina Boell and Anna Babarczy. Contextual effects on the processing of Hungarian pre-verbal focus sentences: an eye-tracking study
  11. Simona Di Paola, Nausicaa Pouscoulous and Filippo Domaneschi. Metaphorical Developing Minds: The role of multiple Factors in the Development of Metaphor Comprehension
  12. Erlinde Meertens, Andrea Beltrama and Maribel Romero. Polar Questions, "or not" Alternative Questions and Complement Alternative Questions: an experimental study
  13. Nadine Bade. Processing Antipresuppositions
  14. Cécile Barbet and Guillaume Thierry. When 'some' triggers a scalar inference out of the blue. An electrophysiological study of a Stroop-like conflict elicited by single words
  15. Eva Link, Holger Schneider, Kristina Schopf, Marcel Schwille, Franziska Rück and Barbara Kaup. Does it matter who is producing an utterance? – Effect of speaker identity in utterances without self-reference
  16. Elisa Kreiss, Judith Degen, Robert Hawkins and Noah Goodman. Mentioning atypical properties of objects is communicatively efficient
  17. Francesca Foppolo, Francesca Panzeri, Greta Mazzaggio and Luca Surian. Find a friend or a scale mate: comparing ad hoc and scalar implicatures
  18. Charlotte Out, Martijn Goudbeek and Emiel Krahmer. Alignment in Naturalistic Dialogue: Language Production in Interactive Reference Production
  19. Jarang Kwak, Haejin Kim, Soyoung Kwon and Donghoon Lee. Influence of Interpersonal Variables during Utterance Comprehension: A Neurophysiological Investigation with the Korean Honorific System
  20. Anton Benz, Nicole Gotzner and Lisa Raithel. Embedded implicature: What can be left unsaid?
  21. Alma Veenstra and Napoleon Katsos. When children accept under-informative utterances: Lack of competence or pragmatic tolerance?
  22. Bing Ngo and Elsi Kaiser. Referential form production in Vietnamese: Effects of modality and topicality --> canceled, see poster on OSF

 

Poster session II:

  1. Stefan Hinterwimmer, Umesh Patil and Andreas Brocher. Do German demonstrative pronouns avoid prominent perspectival centers?
  2. Judith Holler, Kobin Kendrick and Stephen Levinson. Turn-timing and the body: Gestures play a core role in coordinating conversation --> (alternate) talk on Thursday 15:00
  3. Paula Rubio-Fernandez and Julian Jara-Ettinger. A new Director task: Modelling common ground through referential specificity --> canceled, see poster on OSF
  4. Diana Mazzarella, Emmanuel Trouche, Hugo Mercier and Ira Noveck. Believing what you're told: Politeness and scalar inferences
  5. Debora Rossi, Simona Di Paola and Filippo Domaneschi. The Aging Factor in Presuppositions Processing
  6. Filippo Domaneschi and Simona Di Paola. The Processing Costs of Presupposition Accommodation
  7. Verena Keite, Ralf Klabunde and Eva Belke. Alternatives in processing ad-hoc implicatures
  8. Corien Bary, Daniel Altshuler, Kristen Syrett and Peter de Swart. Factors licensing embedded present tense in speech reports
  9. Saskia Brockmann and Nadine Bade. Evidence for global pronoun resolution
  10. Myrto Pantazi, Mikhail Kissine and Olivier Klein. Automatic Content Accommodation: Direct Perception and Meta-Cognitive Vigilance
  11. Margaret Kroll and Matthew Wagers. Interaction of parentheticals, (not-)at-issue content, and working memory
  12. Heather Burnett and Barbara Hemforth. A Bayesian Game-Theoretic Approach to Cross-Linguistic Variation
  13. Elli Tourtouri, Francesca Delogu and Matthew Crocker. Over-specification and uniform reduction of visual entropy facilitate referential processing
  14. Maria Spychalska, Ludmila Reimer, Petra Schumacher and Markus Werning. Scalar implicatures in the context of full and partial information. Evidence from ERPs.
  15. Stephanie Solt, Jon Stevens and Brandon Waldon. "Some" approximations: an experimental investigation
  16. Jérémy Zehr and Florian Schwarz. Returning to Non-entailed Presuppositions Again
  17. Ye Tian and Chris Cummins. Top-down and bottom-up cues to speech acts
  18. Chao Sun and Richard Breheny. On the compositional interpretation of scalar quantifiers: The role of the residue set
  19. Amanda Pogue and Michael Tanenhaus. Exploring how speakers mark, and listeners assess, certainty
  20. Stanley Donahoo and Vicky Tzuyin Lai. What the hell? What swearing can tell us about conventional implicatures
  21. Sarah Dolscheid, Franziska Schleussinger and Martina Penke. Different pragmatic interpretations of German ‘eine’ (a/one) in children and adults
  22. Andreas Trotzke. Approaching the pragmatics of exclamations experimentally --> canceled
  23. Viola Schmitt and Daniele Panizza. What and means: a study on the intersective vs. non-intersective construal of VP-and

 

Canceled talk: Galit W. Sassoon, Natalia Meir, Julie Fadlon, David Anaki and Petra B. Schumacher. The acceptability, processing and neural signature of nominal gradability. --> see slides on OSF

 

Satellite Workshop

 

Revising formal semantic and pragmatic theories from a neurocognitive perspective

 Bochum, 19-20 June 2017

Over the last few decades we observe a growing interest in using experimental methods to investigate semantic and pragmatic theories. Experimental pragmatics has become a flourishing interdisciplinary research area. Aside from behavioral methods, such as reaction time measurement, eye-tracking and acceptability judgments, researchers have become increasingly interested in investigating language processing on the neural level and by this means shedding more light on semantic and pragmatic theories. To this end, they employ techniques such as electroencephalography (EEG), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), magnetoencephalography (MEG) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Although this enterprise has resulted in a large amount of interesting data about linguistic processing, the interpretation of these results remains debated with respect to their relevance for more formal theories of meaning.  On the one hand, it often is difficult to formulate clear processing predictions for semantic and pragmatic theories, on the other hand, the theoretical interpretation of the activations observed with neuroimaging tools is not fully understood. As a result, the neurolinguistics and formal semantic/pragmatic communities remain still rather disjoint. In this workshop we would like to bridge the gap and discuss the challenges of combining the two approaches.

 

Invited speakers

Valentina Bambini

Harm Brouwer

Ira Noveck

Steve Politzer-Ahles

Petra Schumacher

 

Organizers

Maria Spychalska & Markus Werning

Contact: maria.spychalska@rub.de

 

Abstract

Extended Deadline: April 10, 2017