skip to content


  • Schumacher PB, Patterson C & Repp M (2024). Famous protagonists interfere with discourse topicality during pronoun resolution. Glossa Psycholinguistics 3(1):9, 1.
  • Patterson C & Schumacher PB (2023). How focus and position affect the interpretation of demonstrative pronouns. Collabra: Psychology 9(1): 75350.
  • Schumacher PB, Patterson C & Repp M (2022). Die diskursstrukturierende Funktion von Demonstrativpronomen. In: G Chiara, L Jędrzejowski & SI Lindemann. Paths through meaning and form. Festschrift offered to Klaus von Heusinger on the occasion of his 60th birthday. Cologne: Universitäts- und Stadtbibliothek Köln.
  • Patterson C, Schumacher PB, Nicenboim B, Hagen J & Kehler A (2022). A Bayesian approach to German personal and demonstrative pronouns. Frontiers in Psychology 12: 672927. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672927
  • Puebla C, Patterson C & Felser C (2021). The timing of interference effects during native and non-native pronoun resolution. In: V Torrens. Syntax processing. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing
  • Patterson C & Schumacher PB (2021). Interpretation preferences in contexts with three antecedents: examining the role of prominence in German pronouns. Applied Psycholinguistics. doi:10.1017/S0142716421000291
  • Patterson C & Felser C (2021). Cleft focus and antecedent accessibility within the discourse unit: evidence from eye movements during reading. In: Holler A, Suckow K, Hemforth B & de la Fuente I. Information structuring in discourse.
  • Patterson C & Schumacher PB (2020). The timing of prominence information during the resolution of German personal and demonstrative pronouns. Dialogue & Discourse 11: 1-39. doi: 10.5087/dad.2020.101
  • Patterson C & Felser C (2019). Delayed application of binding Condition C during cataphoric pronoun resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 48: 453-475. doi: 10.1007/s10936-018-9613-4.
  • Patterson C, Esaulova Y & Felser C (2017). The impact of focus on pronoun resolution in native and non-native sentence comprehension. Second Language Research 33: 403-429. doi: 10.1177/0267658317697786
  • Jacob G, Lago S & Patterson C (2017). L2 processing and memory retrieval: some empirical and conceptual challenges. (Commentary). Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20: 691-693. doi: 10.1017/S1366728916000948
  • Cunnings I, Patterson C & Felser C (2015). Structural constraints on pronoun binding and coreference: evidence from eye movements during reading. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 840. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00840
  • Patterson C (2014). The role of structural and discourse-level cues during pronoun resolution. Doctoral thesis, University of Potsdam.
  • Patterson C, Trompelt H & Felser C (2014). The online application of binding condition B in native and non-native pronoun resolution. Frontiers in Psychology 5: 147. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00147
  • Cunnings I, Patterson C & Felser C (2014). Variable binding and coreference in sentence comprehension: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 71, 39-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.10.001
  • Patterson C (2013). Discourse coherence in pronoun resolution. Discours [Online], 12. doi: 10.4000/discours.8820
  • Patterson C (2012). The effect of local discourse coherence on pronoun resolution: an eye-tracking study. In: C. Gkonou and M. Alharbi (eds). Essex Graduate Student Papers in Language and Linguistics Online, Vol. 13, 96-119.